Many subcommittee members see a parallel between this latest controversy and another of several years’ standing involving men in female attire (“drag”). However, a majority of the GFDC had decided that the “freedom” theme itself requires that people be allowed the attire of their choice. The 19 events in San Francisco attracted 250,000 to 300,000 people and received national publicity. Thus, they proposed a ban on leather and chains for this year’s celebration.

Some “S&M” entries had immediately followed Women Opposed to Violence and Pornography in the Media.īondage symbolism, objectors this year contend, provides not only sensation for non-Gay media coverage, but also emits a message contrary to the freedom theme of Gay Pride Week.

Several of the core of 60 people who have participated in this year’s planning meetings had objected to a 1978 “parade” occurrence. The 1979 Gay Freedom Day Committee will apparently take the advice of its March Subcommittee and not attempt to bar persons who appear in chains, leather and other bondage symbolism in the eighth annual parade on June 24.